Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Dec 20

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
12/20/2005 7:29 AM 

From friend Tim L., a statement from an unnamed CEO of an unnamed company:

"Because the accelerated options are significantly underwater, the accelerated vesting will avoid the unfair representation of the company's compensation costs that would arise from recognizing future accounting expenses that significantly exceed the current fair value of the associated stock options. Avoiding this stock option expense will better reflect the true economic realities of these stock options.

Do you suppose he is writing to the FASB urging the adoption of exercise date accounting that he clearly thinks is the fair representation?"


Umm... no. But I suspect we'll see a lot more of this brain-numbing double-speak starting in the first quarter of 2006, when the whole world reports earnings with all stock compensation included in them.


* * * * * * * * * * * * *


Apologies in advance: postings are going to be slim this week. The holidays, yada, yada, yada, Accounting Observer piece, yada, yada, yada. And they'll be scarcer next week: I'm going to take five. I suspect that the rest of the world will too, so let's all come back fresher in 2006.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.