Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Feb 28

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
2/28/2006 8:34 AM 

As mentioned a couple weeks ago, one of the newer types of restatements we're seeing has to do with "floor plan financing" in the cash flow statement. Firms had been showing floor plan financing transactions lumped into the operating cash flows, when these third-party transactions are more accurately displayed in the financing section of the cash flow statement. A December speech by Joel Levine, the SEC's Associate Chief Accountant for the Division of Corporation Finance, at the AICPA SEC/PCAOB "current events conference" has raised awareness of the issue.

This morning, AutoNation filed a non-reliance 8-K indicating that they'll restate the 2004 and 2004 information in the cash flow statement in their 2005 annual report. Apparently, the restatement was prompted by a "customary review letter" (as they put it) sent by the SEC.

Hey, all review letters from the SEC aren't the end of the world. This one had a happy result for AutoNation, in that the restatement makes operating cash flow look better than it did before: for 2004, the revised cash flow from operations increased by $121.8 million; for 2003, it increased by $115.5 million. Maybe virtue is its own reward, after all.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.