Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Feb 27

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
2/27/2006 5:39 AM 

Probably the most entertaining writer/economist/lawyer/actor I've ever encountered is Ben Stein. (And of course, the only writer/economist/lawyer/actor I've ever encountered.) About five years ago, I had the chance to see him in person at a conference sponsored by the CFA Institute (the Association for Investment Management & Research at the time) in Los Angeles. He's even funnier and sharper-witted in person than on paper, and he held the audience in the palm of his hand while he amused them with his investing tales. Unfortunately, they walked out of the room with him - and I was the next speaker, with my not-nearly-as-entertaining missives about pension accounting and stock option accounting.

Ben Stein is a tough act to follow, regardless. And I always enjoy his columns in the New York Times. I particularly enjoyed his piece yesterday about ExxonMobil; I only wish he'd written it when the oil-bashing was at its peak around the time that XOM had released their now-fabled earnings for the fourth quarter. Ben's point: who are critics angry with, when they're angry at oil companies for their profits? Are their executives vampirizing their employees, sucking away fruit of their labor for themselves? No. Should the ExxonMobil's critics be angry with the stockholder-owners? That would be self-hatred, because about "41 percent of the stock is owned by retirement funds, private, public (federal, state and local) and individual retirement accounts. In other words, by us." Should critics be angry at say, teachers, because one of Exxon Mobil's biggest holders is the giant College Retirement Equities Fund and they can now afford new golf clubs?

As Ben puts it, we can be angry at "them" all we want, but in the end, "them" is "us." It doesn't make sense to be outraged about Exxon Mobil's profits. (And before I forget - I do not hold any Exxon Mobil securities, do any work with them, or anything else. I just happen to agree with Ben.)

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.