Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Feb 24

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
2/24/2006 8:41 AM 

Remember the "Bizarro-Jerry" episode of Seinfeld where everything was inverted - Jerry had a beautiful girlfriend but was repulsed by her "man-hands", Kramer became a trusted executive in a firm when he was mistaken for someone else in the men's room, and Elaine had a trio of new friends who mirrored Jerry, Kramer and George - but were their polar opposites in temperament? It was a play on Seinfeld's fascination with Superman who sometimes visited a mirror-opposite Bizarro universe. (Don't ask me more about this; I was a Marvel Comics guy. What I know about Supe and Bizarro, I learned from Seinfeld.)

Anyway, from the looks of it - H&R Block has crossed over into the Bizarro universe, where up is down, back is forward, and black is white. As even a fourth-grade comics reader knows, Block is in the business of helping people with their taxes - yet in the Bizarro-universe, they can't get their own taxes right. Last June, they announced that they were restating their financials for 2003 and 2004, partly due to income tax accounting errors.

Yesterday, they filed another non-reliance 8-K, warning investors not to rely on financials for the fiscal years of 2004 and 2005, and the first two quarters of the current fiscal year. Reason: errors in determining the state effective income tax rate, resulting in a cumulative understatement of net state income tax liability totaling about $32 million at the end of 2005. The correction, on a cumulative basis, will be material to the January 31, 2006 financials.

Tax accounting, in and of itself, can be a pretty bizarre affair. H&R Block is proving that it can take even more bizarre turns. Superman, where are you now?

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.