Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
May 15

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
5/15/2007 5:54 AM 

Another SAB 108 housekeeping cleanup dealing with options, this one from Cognos' 2007 10-K.

Cognos went the beginning-of-year retained earnings adjustment route to clean up two errors. The first dealt with stock option practices. Like Bed Bath & Beyond, the firm hadn't discovered its option practice problems until the current year and therefore, could not have applied either the rollover method or iron curtain method all along the years of improper practice. SAB 108 calls for the proper application of just one of them over time if the beginning-year adjustment treatment is to be earned. Cognos did evaluate the problems as far back as 1996 - but it didn't evaluate them until the current year. All told, it amounted to about a $4 million adjustment.

Cognos also had a revenue issue, not too dissimilar from what had been noted at Apria Healthcare and Lincare Holdings. These firms had basically recognized revenue in full for the month in which they billed a customer, rather than starting the revenue clock running from the date of billing. Cognos was following the same principle in their support service area; upon correcting it, the deferred revenues were pumped by almost $8 million. The net after-tax effect was about $6 million.

Nothing stunning about the size of the corrections, though one might disagree with the finessing of the retained earnings stock option treatment. (From the 10-K, it did sound like the firm was aware of the "off-ness" of the revenues all along since 2003.) What's curious is the sort of mini-pattern (or just coincidence) emerging in the area of revenues and stock options: looks like firms are only too willing to bury stock option issues as soon as they find them. And it looks like revenue imprecision related to the timing of billing is rather common.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.