Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
May 14

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
5/14/2007 7:10 AM 

Interesting case developing in Tech-Land... one that doesn't even include options backdating.

Semiconductor manufacturer International Rectifier gave a heads-up to investors in early April that all was not right with its financials for the year ended June 30, 2006 and various quarterly periods. At the time of their announcement, the company was still in the preliminary stages of their investigation and really didn't offer much in the way of describing what was wrong with the financials.

Now they've fleshed things out a bit, and filed another non-reliance 8-K with more details. What happened?

A foreign subsidiary had, "from time to time," entered unrequested orders from customers into the revenue system. That "resulted in the shipment of products and the recording of sales with no obligation by customers to receive and pay for the products. The practice included routing certain product shipments to warehouses not on the Company's logistical systems."


You could consider that a pretty serious lack of internal controls; so does IR's audit committee. Interestingly, the 8-K notes that "a significant increase in the reported sales by that subsidiary during the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005 may have resulted from the practice described above." That sounds like someone was very concerned about meeting targets and felt compelled to be creative.

No word yet from the company on the extent of how the improper "sales" affected revenues, receivables and inventory; all things in due time, one supposes. The company may have missed the forest for the trees in completing its internal control review at the end of 2006; no mention of the foreign situation in its internal control report - and no contradiction of their assessment by their auditors, either.


* * * * * * * * * * *

One backdating-related bleat for the day: Dean Foods mentioned in its 10-Q that it had been notified by the SEC that the informal investigation into its option practices had ended with no recommended enforcement action. This is just after the same kind of disclosure by Nabors Industries. Is this what the end of the options backdating investigations looks like?

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.