Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Apr 30

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
4/30/2007 4:23 AM 

Interesting development in London, as reported in the Financial Times: Grant Thornton and RSM Robson Rhodes plan to combine operations.

The combined firm would be the next largest firm after the Big Four, but a distant fifth: its combined revenue last year would have been only one-third of fourth-place Ernst & Young's.

The Big Four aren't making up contingency plans, one would think, but it's a healthy development for those who are concerned that the Big Four might become too complacent about their place in the world - and the kind of audit quality that comes from complacence. There's no reason to think that there aren't more combination possibilities at the lower end of the audit world - possibilities that would only be encouraged by regulators. The Big Four, on the other hand, might not get such friendly regulatory receptions if they try to make any more acquisitions of significant size.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.