Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Sep 29

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
9/29/2006 6:59 AM 

About six months ago, CSK Auto announced that they were investigating inventory and vendor allowance problems and issued the now-traditional non-reliance 8-K filing.

Yesterday, they released the preliminary results of their investigation. An excerpt from their most recent press release filed with yesterday's 8-K:

"Based on preliminary results of the investigation, the Company previously announced probable maximum estimated overstatements relative to its previously filed October 31, 2005 balance sheet of approximately $70 million in inventory and $12 million in vendor allowances. As previously reported, the Company also identified an estimated overstatement of between $3 million and $7 million of store surplus fixtures and supplies. In addition, it is expected that the restatement will result in material changes that both increase and decrease previously reported results of operations for the periods that will be restated. At this time, no facts have been developed that would indicate that any of the foregoing items would have a material adverse effect on historical revenues or cash flows or on the Company's ongoing or future business operations."

The company has yet to file financials for its 2006 operations. The problems noted above go back to 2003; the previously filed financials haven't been restated yet either, but they're pending. The company's president and its CFO, "as well as several other individuals in the Company's finance organization are no longer employed by the Company."

The item is a curiosity because none of these issues mentioned are at the cutting edge of accounting theory. We're talking about accounting for inventory, what to do with credits given by suppliers, and how to account for store fixtures - not exactly on the same level as accounting for fair values of derivative instruments. It's basic blocking and tackling for retailers. And it demonstrates the need for assessing controls involving basic blocking and tackling. The firm identified the issues in its first Section 404 review last year.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.