Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Sep 26

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
9/26/2006 3:24 AM 

A couple of news articles about a few denizens of the Enron era surfaced in the past week. You might not remember the name Jamie Olis like you'd remember Ken Lay, but he was a tax accountant with Dynegy who helped arrange that firm's "Project Alpha" to inflate revenues and cash flows using swaps, SPEs and secret side agreements. After the investigation, Olis received a lot of attention for the harshness of his sentence: 24 years. That sentence was tossed out last year in the U.S. Court of Appeals, for being unreasonable. He's been resentenced (by the same judge who sentenced him the first time, Judge Sim Lake) to a six year sentence. Lake also managed the Lay and Skilling trials.

Speaking of Skilling - he's in the news again. Sadly, this time for being ticketed for the misdemeanor of public intoxication as his sentencing date looms on October 23. Meanwhile, fellow Enron perpetrator Andrew Fastow promotes a button-down, nice guy image of a helpful community volunteer as his sentencing date approaches.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.