Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Sep 20

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
9/20/2006 6:52 AM 

Just released yesterday: a letter from new Chief Accountant Conrad Hewitt (his first public missive) to representatives of the financial preparer and auditor communities.

The letter summarizes relevant issues for preparers and auditors to consider in evaluating whether or not an option "mis-pricing" event has occurred. It's just in time before the 2006 audit season gets going; given the attention raised by the press on the issue, and the impetus provided by the PCAOB, auditors will be spending more time than usual on "old-time" options this year. Why does it matter, if the options grants pre-date the financial statements being reported upon? Because it's possible that if the correct accounting treatment had been used, the effects could still have a lingering compensation effect on current year financial statements. Or, perhaps there could have been a material effect on the financial statements of several years ago which are still presented in the comparative package.

The Hewitt letter draws on the observations made by the SEC staff in its investigations to date. Will it launch hundreds of restatements or catch-up adjustments? That's going to depend on how well auditors match up circumstances they find with the "fact patterns" presented in the letter. We'll have to see what they find in the first place, but it should be an interesting fourth quarter. Even if no widespread problems are uncovered.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.