Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Sep 18

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
9/18/2006 7:01 AM 

SEC Chairman Christopher Cox delivered introductory remarks to the 30th Annual Southwest Regional Enforcement Conference last Thursday. Not your typical crowd of accounting wonks; it's made up of law enforcement types for state securities regulators and the U.S. attorney general's office.

So, Chairman Cox didn't focus on say, pension rate assumptions or volatility estimates for option compensation calculations. He did, however, mention backdating because of the extraordinary focus on the subject by regulators and the press. Below, his comments:

"By the time we brought our first major case, in late July against Brocade Communications Systems, we had been on the job for some time. Brocade was the first public step, but the SEC's investigation has been underway for years.

And its geographic footprint is broad. We have many cases here in this region. It covers many industries. As some of the investigations conclude, the American public will get a fuller sense of the picture.

But just as important is making sure that everyone understands our rules, so that the line between observance and transgression is a bright one that everyone can see.

So just a few weeks ago, on July 26, when we adopted new rules on executive compensation, we issued guidance to management and directors on what exactly is expected of them.

And we will soon issue further accounting guidance that will help honest companies to avoid any problems with the law."


It'll be a lot more interesting to see how that "further accounting guidance" affects the companies having the problems with the law.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.