Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Aug 30

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
8/30/2006 6:23 AM 

As mentioned before, the fourth quarter of 2006 may be the beginning of a new Ice Age for defined benefit pension plans. IBM may have gotten it started, but other firms have jumped on the bandwagon - Tenneco last week, DuPont yesterday.

Troll through EDGAR, and you can find a couple other freezes occurring in an otherwise sultry summer: outdoor equipment manufacturer Blount International, and uniform services provider G&K Services both moved to freeze benefits. Tire retreader Bandag is another one, along with AK Steel Holdings, insulation maker Lydall, Inc., and pen maker A.T. Cross.

What do they all have in common? Besides having pension plans that are turning chilly, they're all pretty small outfits - the largest market cap belongs to AK Steel, at about $1.4 billion. The rest are all comfortably under $1 billion. It's not an exhaustive sample, admittedly - but it is one of those things that strikes you pretty quickly from a casual examination of the data. And it makes sense that small companies should be among the first to freeze plans: they often complain that they face many handicaps because of their size, and it would be logical for them to take advantage of any reasonable cost-cutting exercise. (I can hear it now: "We froze our pension plans to offset the increased costs of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404.")

It also makes sense that the small firm freezing activity is pretty much unnoticed by the press. When a company the size of DuPont freezes its plans, it's big news. When a company with a $400 million market cap freezes its pension plan, it's a space-filler on the back page. Yet you might wonder: will the small "freezing" firms will see a bigger improvement in their results than the bigger ones? Might be an interesting study in a year or so. Or sooner.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.